DRDLiquid Handling
Menu
Contact DRD
Back to homepage

Applications & Science

Evidence for Better Low-Volume Liquid Handling

Explore application results and technical studies behind Differential Pipetting™—from 0.5 µL NGS preparation to nanoliter measurement, contact-free delivery, and comparisons with conventional pipettors.

Standard curve from a DRD low-volume NGS preparation application
Application evidenceLow-volume delivery made measurable.
0.5 µLNGS NaOH delivery
200–900 nLArtel study range
0.75–10 µLComparative testing
15 studiesTechnical evidence library

Application 01 · Next-generation sequencing

Reliable 0.5 µL delivery for Illumina sample preparation.

A Tufts University core facility used the DRD Differential Pipettor to deliver 0.5 µL NaOH contact-free during Illumina sample preparation—an example of precise transfer where reagent cost, contamination, and repeatability matter.

“We find it easy to use and very reliable as well as very accurate at low volumes. The contact-free dispensing is a nice feature.”

Tufts University core facility · reported customer feedback
Discuss an NGS workflow
NGS sample preparation with low-volume liquid handling
NGS application standard curve
Representative application data from the DRD science archive.

Research themes

Four questions the evidence addresses.

The study series moves from technique fundamentals to comparative performance and the mechanics that make contact-free delivery possible.

01

Aspiration technique

Tip immersion depth matters. DRD studies show that excessive submersion can increase aspirated volume through hydrostatic effects.

02

Contact-free delivery

Blastoff dispensing avoids the angle, distance, and surface-contact variables introduced by touch-off-and-drag workflows.

03

Precision & accuracy

Comparative studies span microliter and sub-microliter volumes, including external correlation with Artel measurement systems.

04

Workflow simplicity

Clean release and fewer technique-dependent steps can support faster training, easier automation, and more reproducible transfers.

Featured findings

Technique, delivery, and performance—made visible.

Selected highlights from the legacy DRD science collection, reorganized around the practical questions labs ask.

Illustration showing correct pipette tip aspiration depth
Technique · Study 01

Keep aspiration depth to 1–2 mm.

Deeper immersion can increase the aspirated amount as hydrostatic pressure adds liquid beyond the intended displacement.

Touch-off and drag low-volume dispensing study
Delivery · Study 04

Touch-off can add 2–3% around 1 µL.

Wick-off from the tip can introduce extra liquid and another operator-dependent variable.

Artel study of dispensing from 200 to 900 nanoliters
Nanoliter range · Study 09

Measured from 200–900 nL.

Artel-based testing examined accuracy at volumes where technique and clean release become especially consequential.

Precision comparison of DRD and conventional pipettors
Comparative performance · Study 07

100 points. No reported outliers.

Testing from 10 µL through 0.75 µL compared Differential Pipetting with leading Gilson and Rainin instruments.

Claims summarize studies presented in DRD’s legacy science archive. Study conditions vary; application-specific validation is recommended.

Technical archive

Fifteen studies. One evidence path.

Scan the complete collection by question, then contact DRD for study files or help applying the findings to a workflow.

01

Aspiration depth

Why the recommended 1–2 mm tip immersion helps avoid hydrostatic over-aspiration.

02

Measuring tiny volumes

Contact-free Blastoff compared with conventional touch-off-and-drag technique.

03

NGS preparation

How accurate low-volume pipetting supports next-generation sequencing workflows.

04

Touch-off variability

Measured wick-off contribution at approximately 1 µL delivery volumes.

05

20 µL performance

Differential Pipettor performance compared with an expert using a Pipetman P20.

06

Speed & ease

Practical workflow benefits beyond high-precision applications.

07

0.75–10 µL comparison

One hundred data points compared with leading manual pipettors, with no reported outliers.

08

Technique correction

A 1 µL coefficient of variation improved to 1.5% after correcting aspiration depth.

09

200–900 nL Artel study

Sub-microliter comparison highlighting contact-free accuracy and reduced technique dependence.

10

Vigorous mixing

Using non-differential mode when higher flow is useful for mixing.

11

Outside correlation

Artel PCS correlation with no reported statistical outliers in the study set.

12

Mechanism

How two piston diameters address the traditional resolution-versus-flow tradeoff.

13

Evidence overview

A consolidated review of precision, accuracy, speed, and ease across the study series.

14

Human + automation

A perspective on giving operators robot-like repeatability while preserving manual flexibility.

15

The cost of outliers

Why fewer failed transfers can reduce repeat work, stress, time, and material consumption.

View the legacy source archive
Diagram of DRD Differential Displacement two-piston mechanism

The mechanism behind the data

Fine resolution without sacrificing delivery force.

Differential Displacement™ uses two pistons of different diameters to make the net displacement small while preserving useful piston travel. The same system can then generate the flow needed for clean, contact-free dispensing.

  • Fine aspiration controlLonger mechanical travel for a tiny net liquid displacement.
  • Clean releaseFlow force suited to contact-free delivery above the destination.
  • Flexible operationDifferential and non-differential modes support precision transfer and vigorous mixing.

Bring us your application

Turn a difficult transfer into a validated workflow.